The Lay people associated with Cistercian monasteries
and their recognition by the OCSO
I - Quick historical background
Origin
There have always been lay people who have found a support for their
spiritual life by the close association with a monastery of monks or nuns. There were often also groups of various
natures attached to a monastery, calling themselves, for example, “the Friends”
of this or that community, or groups devoting themselves to the study and the
propagation of the Cistercian culture and tradition.
Since a little more than a quarter of a century a different phenomenon
appeared and has not ceased growing. It consists
of lay people living a great communion with a Cistercian community and feeling
the call to embody in their lay life the essential values of the Cistercian spirituality.
Cistercian spirituality being primarily coenobitic, these lay people generally
gathered in groups or communities of lay persons attached at a local monastic
community.
International
meetings
This movement developed to such a point that these groups of Lay
Cistercians periodically organized International meetings to share their experiences
and to see whether it were possible to receive a certain official recognition from
the Cistercian Orders.
There were the meetings of Quilvo in Chile (2000), of Conyers in the USA
(2002), of La Grange of Clairvaux in France (2005),
of Huerta in Spain (2008) and now of Dubuque in the USA (2011).
General Chapters
The existence of these Lay Cistercians, their regrouping in communities
attached to various monasteries, and their periodic international meetings were mentioned at almost all the General Chapters of the
OCSO since 1984, and was the object of a thorough study in Commissions at
the MGM of 1993 and 2008. The Order
always expressed an open and sympathetic attitude in their regards, without
however wanting to legislate about them, recognizing the right and the
responsibility for each community to have such a group.
Some Lay Cistercians were invited to the MGM de1993 and the members of the
Steering Committee were invited to
the Chapters of 2005 and 2008. A member
of the Order was designated by the MGM of 2005 to act as liaison between the
Order and these groups and he was confirmed in his function by the MGM of 2008.
All these gestures constituted in an obvious way a semi-official
recognition of this movement by the Order.
Huerta 2008
The international meeting of Lay Cistercians at Huerta in 2008 had a
particular importance. It had been prepared during the previous three years by
a well-coordinated reflection on the level of the Regions or various parts of
the Order. The participants prepared an
important document called “Lay Cistercian Identity” in which they gave an
expression to their Cistercian identity, describing the values that they wished
to live and which they committed themselves to live. They expressed also the desire of some form
of recognition by the Cistercian Order.
In another document called “Bonds of Charity”, they constituted themselves
as an International association of Communities of Lay Cistercians. The goal was not obviously to create a kind
of Third Cistercian Order, nor even to constitute an International Association
of Faithful, which would then ask to be recognized by the Holy See. The goal was simply to have a kind of
permanent existence as a moral person, the members of each international
meeting only being
able to make this commitment for themselves.
The constitution of this Association also allowed all the Lay Cistercians,
as a moral person, to dialogue with the various authorities of the Cistercians Orders.
MGM 2008
The members of the Steering
Committee elected at the Huerta Meeting were invited to the MGM of 2008 as
they had been at that of 2005. They presented the document on The Lay Cistercian
Identity to the meeting, and it was studied by four Mixed Commissions of the MGM.
These exchanges led to a vote acknowledging this phenomenon of the Lay Cistercians
as a lay expression of the Cistercian charism.
(I will explain in a few moments the scope of this vote). In a second
vote, the MGM asked the Regional Conferences to reflect on the document
presented by the Lay Cistercians in order to see what the Order could assume.
All the Regions except one were able to carry out this reflection before
the meeting of the Central Commissions at Tilburg in 2010. The Central Commissions decided to put the
question on the program of the MGM of 2011 where it will be treated according
to the ordinary procedure, i.e. by four Mixed Commissions.
The Central Commissions asked me to prepare a document on the work of
the Regions on this subject. This is
that document.
II - The MGM of 2008 and its follow up
Importance of vote 71
“We recognize the existence of a lay expression of our Cistercian charism
in the lived experience of the groups of lay persons associated with a number of
the monasteries of our Order” (Yes 132; No 21; Abst
10).
One cannot not insist strongly enough on the importance and the scope of
this vote. The General Chapters and the MGM since Holyoke (1983) had given an
indirect and semi-official recognition to this movement. In 2008, we have an official and very clear recognition. It is important to weigh well all the
elements in the formulation of this vote.
The recognition relates to groups,
not on individuals. It relates to groups
attached to monasteries of our Order.
That obviously does not imply any value judgment on what can be lived by
individuals not attached to any specific group, or by groups not attached to any
monastic community. What is limited here
is quite simply the breadth of the field on which the Order can make a decision
and about which indeed it decides. The MGM
OCSO could obviously not make decisions about the groups attached to
monasteries of other Orders.
What the MGM, i.e. the two General Chapters of Nuns and Monks affirm in
this vote goes beyond all that which the fervent promoters of this movement
could have hoped for. The MGM affirms
that “We recognize the existence of a lay expression of our Cistercian charism
in the lived experience of the groups of lay persons associated with a number of
the monasteries of our Order”.
Such an approach presupposes an attitude which it is important to mention. This attitude, that one
finds in various documents of the Order since the Vatican II Council,
consists in conceiving that the “Cistercian charism” is larger than the whole
of the institutions officially recognized as Cistercian. This charism does not belong to the Cistercian
Orders, nor even to the whole of the present monks and
nuns. Like any charism, it belongs to
the whole Church, that is, to the whole of God's people. If God wanted this new
expression of the Cistercian charism to appear, as He had caused several other
expressions to appear in the past, it is our responsibility “to recognize it”.
Once this recognition was affirmed, the question which followed
logically was: “What attitude should the Order (and more precisely the General Chapters
that made this recognition) take vis-a-vis this new expression? ”. The discussions made in Mixed Commissions of
the MGM on the document “Lay Cistercian Identity” were not concrete enough to
allow the Commission of Coordination of the MGM to formulate votes on this
subject. It limited itself to
formulating a vote (nº 72) asking the Regions to continue the study of this
document “so as to see what we as an Order can assume”. It should be recognized that the last part of
this last vote is not completely clear, and the Regions hardly touched this
question.
The position of the Regions
A good synthesis of the reflection of the Regions is to be found in the
Minutes of the meeting of the Central Commissions at Tilburg in 2010.
As a whole, the Regions take for granted vote 71, even if all do not
seem to have perceived all the scope of it. In any case, nobody calls this vote
into question.
A certain number of Regions -- about half -- think that we should limit
ourselves to this declaration of 2008 and not to legislate more. The others think that it would be necessary
or convenient to establish criteria for the recognition of a group of Lay Cistercians
attached to a given monastic community.
In any event, all the Regions raise sufficient questions for the Central
Commissions to decide to put this whole question (and not only such or such
aspect) on the program of the next MGM (“We wish to place the topic of Lay Cistercians
on the programme of the MGM of 2011”).
In what follows I will try to describe, starting from the minutes of the
meetings of the Regional Conferences, the questions which still arise and to
which the MGM of 2011 will have to endeavor to give an answer.
III - Questions and concerns
A) The question of
the Cistercian Identity
This question had been raised and lengthily discussed at Huerta within
the context of the formulation of the document “Lay Cistercian Identity”. Within the framework of this discussion it
had become obvious that it was not a question, for anyone, “to confer” this Cistercian
identity on a group, but simply “to recognize it”.
One or the other Region suggests that one do not speak any more of “lay Cistercians”,
but of Associates of such or such
monastery. To that one can answer that the MGM of 2008 already went beyond this
problem, by recognizing explicitly the Cistercian character of the lived
experience of such groups.
As the MGM speaks explicitly about groups attached to a monastic
community, the fact of belonging to a group and the relationship
with a monastic community seem essential for this recognition.
The role of the
monastic community
All that was said at the General Chapter, in the discussions in Mixed
Commissions as well as in the Plenary assembly seems
to go in the following direction: it belongs to the local monastic Community to
recognize or not to recognize the “Cistercian” character of what a group attached
to the community lives.
The Order is a community of communities, within which the important
orientations are made in a collegial manner at the General Chapter. During approximately a quarter of a century
the Order let the movement known as of the Lay Cistercians
evolve freely, counting on the responsible attitude of each
community. But from the moment when the
Order, in an official and collegial way, recognized the Cistercian character of
the lived experience of such groups, it is normal that the Order establish
certain criteria for this “recognition” which it chose to assume. This is why
several people think that the Order should at least establish some criteria for
the whole of the Order to be able to assume the recognition made by the local community.
At the least, an explicit intervention of the Superior in the name of
the community is considered necessary.
From this point of view it is not enough that a group be formed around a
monk or of a nun, even if it is with a kind of implicit agreement from the
superior. There must be at least a degree
of intervention by the superior so that one can speak about a recognition made
by the community.
Out of a preoccupation of justice towards the whole monastic community as
well as towards the lay community, some Regions suggest that such an official
recognition be made not by the superior alone but by a vote of the conventual Chapter.
On the one hand that would ensure that the decision is not made without
a serious examination and, on the other hand, this Community decision could not
be cancelled easily.
Not recognized groups
and isolated people
It is clear that the “recognition” given by the Order in its vote 71 of
the MGM of 2008 does not apply to groups of sharing, prayer, etc., which are
not connected with a specific monastic community and are not explicitly
recognized by one. This not-recognition
does not imply any value judgment on what these groups live. It does not seem
however legitimate on their part to give themselves the title of “Cistercian”.
It is the same thing with the isolated persons who live -- or consider
that they live – the Cistercian spirituality, even in a close union with monks
or nuns or with a community. What they
live corresponds rather to the situation of oblates. The oblate situation is a primarily an individual
membership, even if several oblates of a monastery can meet for common
exercises. The reality recognized by the
MGM of 2008 is a primarily Community reality.
Some additional questions
Responsibility: One or the other Region said that the Order as such should not assume
responsibility vis-a-vis
the movement of Lay Cistercians. To that
one can answer that by inviting representatives of Lay Cistercians to the
meetings of the MGM and especially by the vote 71 of the last MGM, the Order
already assumed its responsibility in their connection. It could give it up only by going back on that decision. Would
this be responsible?
Cistercian family: One Region asks that we do not recognize Lay Cistercians as belonging
to the Cistercian Family. On this subject one must clarify that the
concept of “Cistercian Family” is not a legal concept. It is simply a beautiful
expression permitting to cover as a whole all the Orders or Congregations or
other institutions in which the Cistercian Tradition and Spirituality are lived. The Blessed Jean-Paul II himself spoke about
the Lay Cistercians as pertaining to the Cistercian family, in his message with
the Cistercian Family in 1998.
The question of
Association
With the passing of years Lay Cistercians held various meetings, as I
mentioned above. At each one of these
meetings the participants present could speak only in their own name and in the
name of their respective groups. Even if
a team was elected to prepare the following meeting, the group which had
elected them ceased existing at the end of the meeting and this team did not
have any moral person to whom to give an account of its work. Even the Steering
Committee elected at meeting of La Grange in 2005, at the suggestion of Dom
Bernardo Olivera, did not represent any moral person. In Huerta, the
participants decided to constitute themselves, on an experimental basis, as an
International association of the Communities of Lay Cistercians. This
Association is not an International association of Faithful in the canonical sense,
which would be approved by Rome and which would be an autonomous lay branch in
relationship to the Chapter of the Abbots and with that of the Abbesses. It is simply an organisational
structure that the existing groups give themselves in order to manage the
communication between them and with the Order.
Conclusion
At the time of the next General Chapters, or MGM of Assisi 2011, the Cistercian
Order of the Strict Observance will have:
1) to take note that it has already recognized
the groups of lay Cistercians attached to communities of the Order as a new
expression of the Cistercian charism.
Nobody suggested calling into question this decision of 2008.
2) to confirm that it extends this recognition
only to the groups (and not to the individuals) clearly attached to a local
community, unless it wants to decide differently on this point which does not
achieve the unanimity.
3) to decide if it wants to establish criteria or conditions which will
have to be applied so that a community of Lay Cistercians can be actually
regarded as being really attached to a monastic community.
4) to decide if it wants to recognize the Association of the communities
of Lay Cistercians and the Coordinating Committee (Steering Committee) as its
interlocutor in all that relates to the relations between Lay Cistercians and
the OCSO.
5) to decide if it again wishes to elect a
member of the Order as a liaison between the Order and the Lay Cistercians.
Armand VEILLEUX